Home /
-->
From time to time, we get the question “what’s the risk of not having a social media monitoring tool?” The question reveals a perception that “social media is just an add-on to other media outlets”. It’s not. Social media has a different set of rules and is reshaping entire markets.
With social media, people are engaging and interacting around context, not necessarily personal relationships. Whereas we used to connect around place (neighborhood, community, schools, associations, etc.) we now link to online personas that share our intellectual interest and emotions. For many, traditional media is no longer the main source of information. Increasingly people turn to social media looking for “someone just like like me” and consequently, many blogs and forums discussions are more important in shaping opinions and perceptions than traditional media outlets.
Likewise, PR and marketing campaigns are no longer about one-to-many communication by distributing press releases and pushing “call to action”. Via social media monitoring tools, companies connect and interact with people that have expressed interest in a particular topic.
Still, the strategy of reaching out to people of influence has not changed. PR and marketing efforts still try to connect with “trust agents” that are likely to pass on a particular message to their networks. In effect, successful campaign management is engaged in one-to-one-to-many communications. The PR or marketing message gets forwarded from one-to-one-to-many if it connects with the interests of the person receiving it, AND if it provides value to his/her network.
The main challenge for companies using social media is therefore the blurring between marketing and communication. Marketers want to use it to sell, communicators to build relationships. Of course, social media is very much about being a real member of a community and providing value, rather than just chasing the next sale. That increases the number of people a company has to deal with, requiring more time and investment in building relationships.
The effect of social media monitoring and interaction will have a profound effect on the PR and marketing industry as we know it. PR and marketing efforts is increasingly about connecting with real people and because everyone is involved in a network, it’s not just up to the people working in the PR and marketing departments. A well thought out strategy will leverage the connections of the entire organization, leaving a more profound, valuable and documentable impact than any traditional campaign could ever hope for.
Want to start listening in on social media conversations? Sign up for the free trial of the Imooty social media monitoring tool today.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b94c37e0-80e7-40e3-be6c-f9acffedf450)
Looking back at 2009, it was decidedly the year to get started with live search media monitoring. If you don’t know what “live search” is, think Twitter.
Never understood what Twitter was all about? Well, then think about this: If I was to go on a little R&R skiing vacation in Bad-Gastein (Austrian Alps), I could do one of two things: Check Google for pages mentioning Bad-Gastein, or search Twitter for the same term.
For the better part of 2009, Google would return a bunch of Bad-Gastein sites optimized for selling travel packages, hotels, spas etc. That’s where live search media monitoring comes into play. Although commercial service providers are relevant for my planning, I’d first of all want to know what the snow conditions were like, preferably from some unbiased source. The hotels, skiing resorts and service providers are unlikely to give me that, which is what makes people so exited about Twitter. It returns real life impressions from people who are there right now!
Google is of course not passively sitting back and has already struck a deal with both Twitter and Facebook which includes search results from them alongside their index and adwords.
This has significant PR implications and companies increasingly need to pay attention and interact with social media users. If a customer service representative is stonewalling customers the word will soon be out on Twitter, which in turn will reveal an unfavorable impression in Google search results. On the flip side, speedy interaction and online reputation management may have the opposite effect.
In other words, now more than ever, it pays to set do live search media monitoring of company and product names. And not just proprietary names, other keywords associated to the products and services should be monitored too. For my Bad Gastein example, it would make sense to monitor, “Skiing vacation in Austria”, “Skiing in Hohe Tauern” and “Austria ski resort guide” too.
For a comprehensive live search media monitoring system, take this opportunity to try out the FREE Imooty.eu trial.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=beba53f9-1c85-4626-9450-73259865e29c)
The first step step beyond social media monitoring is developing listening skills. Needless to say, companies have a lot to gain from understanding the customers problems. By providing solutions and sharing knowledge, content is likely to be passed on and advocated by consumers.
So what’s the problem?
When you say that you have an open and receptive online presence, it creates an expectation. Specifically, an expectation of being heard. Active social media monitoring and a policy for when/how to respond to feedback, is priority number one for building customer relationships and trust. Do not make the mistake of ignoring a customer who expects being heard.
Most companies hesitate to take the step from social media monitoring to active interaction because of perceived risks. A fear that everything will spin out of control if people start communicating via Twitter. However, there are also risks associated with not participating. The indecisiveness is an expression of sticking with the status quo and keeping with the old hierarchical communication structure. However, adapting to social media is unlikely to undo the company. Mistakes will be made, sure, but that is part of what makes social media appealing.
Companies seem to have a hard time speaking about anything else than their products. To avoid looking pushy, or worse, boring, find topics that connect to the bigger picture. Kodak’s photography blog for example isn’t just about their products.
Also, users increasingly expect websites to be interactive, not just an online version of the company brochure. They’re looking for fresh content, articles, videos, podcasts and links to the latest developments in your industry. Content generation is unlikely to work very well in a top-down structure. If the IT department needs to recode the website every time someone wants to contribute, social interaction will never happen. It is important to have an easy to publish CMS. Once the new PR and communiation policy is in place, everyone should be able to share and contribute.
Taking the step from social media monitoring to participation doesn’t have to be a major undertaking. It doesn’t take hi-tech tools to connect with your customers. Think corporate blog, Twitter and a Facebook page.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8b5ac959-c28e-4f53-b28b-45f3dd2b63fb)
Yesterday it was time to thank our interns for their efforts over the past few months. Edward and Ana came to us via “Leonardo”, a program which helps young professionals find internships abroad. Edward worked on our visual media monitoring system whereas Ana did a great job with research of online reputation management services in Spain.
Kristina has also done a terrific job over the last few months. Her awareness of the particular PR needs of the Web 2.0 generation, helped us develop an online monitoring service for the next generation media monitoring professionals.
Together we all went to a Biergarten by the river, across from the Bode Museum. It was one of those nights when people clearly had not been out for a while… It has been a crappy summer so far and instead of constantly checking mobile news, folks could finally bake in the sun, have a drink and dance tango as the boats went honking by.
It turned out to be a good start of the summer and we hope we’ll be as lucky with our next interns as with Ana, Edward & Kristina.
Thank you!
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=9843634c-be3e-4869-ad06-e8be958b866f)
What media content do you consider trustworthy? Are online information sources part of your online monitoring? According to eMarketer and TNS, a recent survey finds that online news sources, rank high as trusted information sources. The most trusted information source is friends and word-of-mouth recommendations. TV news and newspapers are considered to be about equally trustworthy.
Especially interesting is the comparison from country to country. Whereas private blogs overall are considered the least reputable, Chinese consumers rank them notably higher. In Scandinavia the most trusted information source is TV news, whereas in Germany and Italy it is Wikipedia (!).
As a online monitoring service, it’s definitely surprising to find Wikipedia as the most trusted information source in Germany and Italy. We’re reminded of Merriam-Webster’s word of the year 2006, namely Stephen Colbert’s adaptation of “truthiness”:
“We’re not talking about truth, we’re talking about something that seems like truth – the truth we want to exist…”
For our own part, we notice a spike in visitor numbers and online monitoring registrations every time a major event takes place. From earthquakes to political scandals, visitors swarm to Imooty for trusted information anytime a big news story breaks.
Want to have your create your own online monitoring service? Try Imooty for FREE today!
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=31d7e193-eff6-4840-b093-6ca699936c21)
