Home / Monitoring Imooty. Fresh posts., Online Reputation Monitoring, media intelligence, media monitoring, news flash, online monitoring, online reputation management, social media monitoring / Beyond social media monitoring, why companies fail
-->
Beyond social media monitoring, why companies fail
The first step step beyond social media monitoring is developing listening skills. Needless to say, companies have a lot to gain from understanding the customers problems. By providing solutions and sharing knowledge, content is likely to be passed on and advocated by consumers.
So what’s the problem?
When you say that you have an open and receptive online presence, it creates an expectation. Specifically, an expectation of being heard. Active social media monitoring and a policy for when/how to respond to feedback, is priority number one for building customer relationships and trust. Do not make the mistake of ignoring a customer who expects being heard.
Most companies hesitate to take the step from social media monitoring to active interaction because of perceived risks. A fear that everything will spin out of control if people start communicating via Twitter. However, there are also risks associated with not participating. The indecisiveness is an expression of sticking with the status quo and keeping with the old hierarchical communication structure. However, adapting to social media is unlikely to undo the company. Mistakes will be made, sure, but that is part of what makes social media appealing.
Companies seem to have a hard time speaking about anything else than their products. To avoid looking pushy, or worse, boring, find topics that connect to the bigger picture. Kodak’s photography blog for example isn’t just about their products.
Also, users increasingly expect websites to be interactive, not just an online version of the company brochure. They’re looking for fresh content, articles, videos, podcasts and links to the latest developments in your industry. Content generation is unlikely to work very well in a top-down structure. If the IT department needs to recode the website every time someone wants to contribute, social interaction will never happen. It is important to have an easy to publish CMS. Once the new PR and communiation policy is in place, everyone should be able to share and contribute.
Taking the step from social media monitoring to participation doesn’t have to be a major undertaking. It doesn’t take hi-tech tools to connect with your customers. Think corporate blog, Twitter and a Facebook page.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8b5ac959-c28e-4f53-b28b-45f3dd2b63fb)
Ok, so you make some nice points there, but it would be really helpful with something more concrete… Can you do a follow-up on this one, perhaps with some recommendations on how to create a social media policy? Many thanks in advance
Yes, we are planning a follow-up on this one, will keep you posted!
“Content generation is unlikely to work very well in a top-down structure”. Excuse me, but how do you think the entertainment industry is organized? In my opinion you need some technical hoops to ensure a minimum level of quality.
Looks to us as if the entertainment industry is having some pretty serious problems because of said top-down structure (re: broadcasters / music / movie industry)